Quote:
Originally Posted by THD
He was the manager from the very formation of Fleetwood Mac surely
Just because his ex missus got his assets (or more likely just some of them ) in a divorce settlement ,does not necessarilly mean she got the rights to any recordings - though she might have of course She may have got the publishers split on the songwriting I'm also unclear about whether any record company can officially release a recording without having the permission of everyone involved in that recording** ? ( There are certain British TV progs which have never been repeated because just one cast member refused to give his permission ,for example )
** perhaps you can enlighten us on that subject Jeremy ?
|
Michelle Reynolds owned and perhaps still owns the Tea Party recordings. As for the other point, yes permission would be needed but is not always sought.