Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotafraid
You write this^, and then in post #49 you tell me and everyone else
that "it also has little if anything to do with the trouble some of her post cause".
|
That part above was my fault, I meant to say that every one of her posts directed at Jeremy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamnotafraid
You could and should have took expand your mind as just me saying
that you should read all my post on the subject before replying like you did
to me.
I can only base why I think Wendy was banned on what Michelle, moderators,
members and what my own eyes read. And then I gave my opinion that I didn't
think she should be permanently banned because of the insight she offered.
Note it's my opinion. And I don't really remember coming here and
knocking the broom out of your hand. Plus I had no idea you consider this
work, or even a work place. Telling Michelle or any moderators how to do
their job? You'll have to point me to those posts. I'm looking forward to that.
In closing. I don't live in fear of you or this place. I enjoy some of my time
here, but it's not something I couldn't live without. All I ask is, if you do respond
to any of my post please be accurate and not so condescending. I'm just a lowly
member that doesn't have light shed on all these matters.
I'd rather speak about the topic of this thread.
I had to pause to watch Stevie on the ACM'S.
|
Hmm. Mkay.
First, when I originally quoted the line that I did from you, it was a reply for everyone... not just for you. Remember you're not the
only one reading this thread, and everyone is going to have questions about why Wendy is no longer here.
What happened next was that you decided to respond to me by saying "expand your mind", which was a condescending thing to start with.
I asked you to keep that to yourself next time. Then in later posts you said I got my "panties in a wad", asked me to "chill out" etc. Again... condescension.
Yes, moderating here is a sort of job, and a privilege. And when you suggested that I expand my mind, and that my response was unwarranted as having only come to "Michele's rescue" , well, excuse me if I see that as dripping with further unnecessary condescension.
Now, since you stated that you're looking forward to me pointing out those instances to you, and that you can't wait to come back with another (what you believe to be) well informed reply, that indicates to me even more mindful instigating behavior on your part. If we were on a playground, it'd be fair of me to say that you started it. Nenny nenny boo boo. That sort of silly thing. So, since we've established you as the primary mover of discontent in this instance, I would only add that any other comment you feel the need to express on the matter be directed at me via private message.