The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
View Poll Results: Will you vote Democratic?
Yes, I'll vote for Obama 27 49.09%
No, I'll vote for McCain 13 23.64%
Only, If Hillary is on the ticket 6 10.91%
I dont know yet 9 16.36%
Voters: 55. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #136  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:27 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

^^^

I think Hillary can oversome the weaker candidate remarks by noting that she consistently said that although Obama is weaker than Hillary, both Hillary and Obama (alone or together) aree stronger than McCain, etc.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:27 AM
HejiraNYC's Avatar
HejiraNYC HejiraNYC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3 View Post
ok maybe change was not the best choice of words..any Democrat would be a change from the abysmal administration that has been ruining the country these last 7 and a half years..I should have said something like "new blood" or 'fresh faces".The Clintons after all were in the White House for 8 years so the perception there is she is more part of the status quo.Hillary is certainly tough and a very sharp woman so those things are pluses.
Maybe I'm just being irrational here, but if a return to peace, prosperity, balanced budgets and advances in civil rights is considered the "status quo," then I'm all for the status quo! **** change!
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:29 AM
HejiraNYC's Avatar
HejiraNYC HejiraNYC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
^^^

I think Hillary can oversome the weaker candidate remarks by noting that she consistently said that although Obama is weaker than Hillary, both Hillary and Obama (alone or together) aree stronger than McCain, etc.
Well, there is that notorious press conference where she said that she and McCain were experienced and capable of leading the country while Obama gave a nice speech in 2002. Those words cut deeply.
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:33 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
Well, there is that notorious press conference where she said that she and McCain were experienced and capable of leading the country while Obama gave a nice speech in 2002. Those words cut deeply.
I missed that one. Do you have a youtube of it?

But, if she were with Obama, she could say something to the effect of yea I said that, but I am here now aren't I.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:34 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
Maybe I'm just being irrational here, but if a return to peace, prosperity, balanced budgets and advances in civil rights is considered the "status quo," then I'm all for the status quo! **** change!
I know. Bill Clinton was far from a perfect Pres. But, clearly the good far outweighed the bad
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #141  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:43 AM
HejiraNYC's Avatar
HejiraNYC HejiraNYC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post

Personally, I think she should not be the VP because I think she is far more effective as a Senator. But, I am willing to go with the will of the D party.
I think the VP slot, just like the First Lady slot, is whatever one wants it to be. There are pretty insignificant VPs like Quayle and Bush, but then there are VPs who are actually functionally closer to being president a la Cheney. With the Clintons as VP, I could totally see how there could be a Cold War-like power struggle in the Executive Branch. It's not easy to suppress "testicular fortitude."

I think Hillary's problem in the Senate is that there is already a long line for the Senate Majority leader slot (and that is assuming that the Democratic control of the senate persists). And as much as I would love to have Hillary as governor of my state, I think that would be a step down for her. In my opinion I think, despite Hillary's endorsement of Obama over the weekend, I think she is still hoping for a last-minute upset at the Convention in August. Sure, she's going to be a good girl and team player. But all it takes is one more major scandal or a major dip in the polls. Tony Rezko has yet to "sing," and many believe that he will start naming names in lieu of a long jail sentence. And then there is the Michelle "whitey" tape that is now rumored to be in Rudy Giuliani's possession and is expected to be released after the convention, that is, assuming that it can be kept under wraps for that long. But then again, there are rumors that party insiders don't really care whether or not Obama wins; they just like the fact that he can raise tons of money for the congressional races and enlist scores of new young and black voters.
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:44 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

McCain cannot win without them, especially if the black vote turns out in record numbers to support Obama - same for the young white vote, which is sort of what happened in the primaries.

_________________________________________________________________

June 9, 2008

Evangelicals Are Still Wary Despite McCain’s Outreach

By MICHAEL LUO

Lori Viars, an evangelical activist in Warren County, Ohio, essentially put her life on hold in the fall of 2004 to run a phone bank for President Bush. Her efforts helped the president’s ambitious push to turn out evangelicals and win that critical swing state in a close election.

But Ms. Viars, who is among a cluster of socially conservative activists in Ohio being courted by Senator John McCain’s campaign through regular e-mail messages, is taking a wait-and-see attitude for now toward Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee.

“I think a lot of us are in a holding pattern,” said Ms. Viars, who added that she wanted to see whom Mr. McCain picked for his running mate.

Ms. Viars’s hesitation illustrates what remains one of Mr. McCain’s biggest challenges as he faces a general election contest with Senator Barack Obama: a continued wariness toward him among evangelicals and other Christian conservatives, a critical voting bloc for Republicans that could stay home in the fall or at least be decidedly unenthusiastic in their efforts to get out the vote.

To address this, Mr. McCain’s campaign has been ramping up its outreach to evangelicals over the last month, preparing a budget and a strategic plan for turning them out in 18 battleground states this fall.

The campaign has been peppering over 600 socially conservative grass-roots and national leaders with regular e-mail messages — highlighting, for example, Mr. McCain’s statement criticizing a May 15 decision by the California Supreme Court overturning the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, or his recent speech on his judicial philosophy. It has also held briefings for small groups of conservative leaders before key speeches. Charlie Black, one of Mr. McCain’s senior advisers, recently sat down with a dozen prominent evangelical leaders in Washington, where he emphasized, among other things, Mr. McCain’s consistent anti-abortion voting record.

Mr. McCain’s outreach to Christian conservatives has been a quiet courting, reflecting a balancing act: his election hopes rely on drawing in the political middle and Democrats who might be turned off should he woo the religious right too heavily by, for instance, highlighting his anti-abortion position more on the campaign trail.

“If McCain tried Bush’s strategy of just mobilizing the base, he would almost certainly fall short,” said John C. Green, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life. “Because the Republican brand name is less popular and the conservative base is restive, McCain has special needs to reach out to independent and moderate voters, but, of course, he can’t completely neglect the evangelical and conservative base.”

The instrumental role of evangelicals in Mr. Bush’s victory in 2004 over Senator John Kerry is an oft-repeated tale at this point. Mr. Bush’s openness about his personal faith and stances on social issues earned him a following among evangelicals, who represented about a quarter of the electorate in 2004. Exit polls in the 2004 election found that 78 percent of white “born again” or evangelical Protestants had voted for Mr. Bush.

In contrast, Mr. McCain’s relationship with evangelicals has long been troubled. In 2000, when he was running against Mr. Bush for the Republican nomination, Mr. McCain castigated Pat Robertson and the Rev. Jerry Falwell as “agents of intolerance.”

In a sign of the lingering distrust, Mr. McCain finished last out of nine Republican candidates in a straw poll last year at the Values Voter Summit in Washington, a gathering for socially conservative activists.

James C. Dobson, the influential founder of the evangelical group Focus on the Family, released a statement in February, when Mr. McCain was on the verge of securing the Republican nomination, affirming that he would not vote for Mr. McCain and would instead stay home if he became the nominee. Dr. Dobson later softened his stance and said he would vote but has remained critical of Mr. McCain.

“For John McCain to be competitive, he has to connect with the base to the point that they’re intense enough that they’re contagious,” said Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council. “Right now they’re not even coughing.”

The balancing act Mr. McCain faces in appealing to both moderate voters and evangelicals was starkly illustrated last month when he rejected the endorsements of the Rev. John Hagee and the Rev. Rod Parsley, prominent evangelical leaders, after controversial statements by the two came to light. Mr. Parsley has been vocally anti-Islam and Mr. Hagee, in a sermon, said Hitler and the Holocaust had been part of God’s plan to drive the Jews to Palestine.

Mr. McCain’s actions complicated his relationship with evangelical leaders, some of whom said in interviews that the senator’s actions contributed to the impression among some evangelicals that he did not know or understand them. They argued that he should have stood by them, while making clear that he did not necessarily agree with all of their views.

“I think that was a stumble that will add to the challenges here,” said Gary Bauer, president of the group American Values, who in February became arguably the most visible evangelical leader to begin actively working on Mr. McCain’s behalf. “Those are both very influential men and it will just make things more challenging to accomplish between now and November.”

Unlike Mr. Bush, Mr. McCain is decidedly reticent about religion on the stump. Mr. McCain grew up Episcopalian and shifted to a Baptist church after marrying his second wife, Cindy, but has not been baptized into the denomination. When asked about his personal faith at town hall forums, he often relates a familiar story. When Mr. McCain was a prisoner of war in Vietnam, a guard who had once loosened his bonds while he was being tortured sidled up to him on Christmas Day and drew a cross on the dirt in front of them. But some evangelical leaders say the account sheds more light on the guard’s faith than on Mr. McCain’s.

Nevertheless, a small group of McCain staff members and surrogates have begun stepping up, largely behind the scenes, his outreach to evangelicals and other social conservatives.

The group includes Marlys Popma, a prominent socially conservative leader in Iowa who has been with the campaign since the beginning but about a month ago took on the title of national coordinator for evangelical and social conservative outreach; Robert C. Heckman, the campaign’s director of conservative outreach who was the political director of Mr. Bauer’s presidential campaign in 2000; and Brett O’Donnell, the campaign’s director of messaging who was a debate coach at Liberty University, Mr. Falwell’s institution.

Former Senator Dan Coats of Indiana, a graduate of Wheaton College, an evangelical school, is also playing an active role, as is Senator Sam Brownback, a Kansas Republican and a longtime social conservative stalwart.

The initial outreach plans call for replicating the campaign’s approach in the Republican primary, creating “Family Issues Leaders for McCain” committees for each state made up of key social conservatives who have endorsed him.

About a dozen people, including staffers and socially conservative leaders who are advising the campaign, have begun a weekly conference call to plot strategy.

Mr. McCain’s advisers said they were in a talking and listening mode with evangelical leaders, as opposed to seeking endorsements aggressively, in part out of recognition that many Christian conservatives remained suspicious of him.

Mr. McCain may be aided by Mr. Obama’s own problems lately among religious voters. Mr. Obama, who speaks comfortably about his own Christian faith, was once seen as the kind of candidate who could help Democrats close the gap with Republicans among weekly churchgoers, who voted for Mr. Bush in droves in 2004. But those efforts have been complicated by the incendiary remarks by Mr. Obama’s former pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., and the comments by Mr. Obama at a fund-raiser in the Bay Area about people in small towns clinging to guns and religion.

Nevertheless, the Obama campaign plans to add a full-time evangelical-focused staff member to its existing religious outreach team and is rolling out an effort over the summer to organize over a thousand house parties built around an hour-and-a-half-long curriculum on faith and politics. With the broadening of the evangelical agenda to include issues like poverty, global warming and AIDS, Mr. Obama’s advisers hope to peel off more moderate evangelical voters.

David Brody, a political correspondent for the Christian Broadcasting Network, said he believed Mr. Obama’s comments had hurt his chances among evangelicals, but he added, “I think Obama has a great opportunity still, with the Jeremiah Wright controversy behind him, to re-introduce himself with the American people, especially with his spiritual walk.”

To make Mr. McCain’s case, his supporters highlight his speech on his judicial philosophy, in which he vowed to appoint judges with a “commitment to judicial restraint,” as well as his anti-abortion voting record, though his critics argue he has hardly been passionate about the issue over the years.

In 2006 Mr. McCain was featured in television advertisements supporting a constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriage in Arizona, but he argued vigorously against a federal ban on the Senate floor that year, breaking with Mr. Bush and the Republican leadership, citing his belief that states should decide the issue.

Many conservative activists revile Mr. McCain for his sponsorship of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance overhaul measure. Similarly, his support for federal financing of embryonic stem cell research puts him at odds with many conservatives.

Mr. McCain’s supporters, however, contend that if they simply outline Mr. McCain’s policy stances on issues that matter to social conservatives and make clear where Mr. Obama stands, the choice will be obvious.

“It’s my job to make sure the people out there in the leadership and the grass roots get a chance to know John McCain for what he really is,” Ms. Popma said.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/09/us...hp&oref=slogin
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 06-09-2008, 08:53 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
I think the VP slot, just like the First Lady slot, is whatever one wants it to be. There are pretty insignificant VPs like Quayle and Bush, but then there are VPs who are actually functionally closer to being president a la Cheney. With the Clintons as VP, I could totally see how there could be a Cold War-like power struggle in the Executive Branch. It's not easy to suppress "testicular fortitude."

I think Hillary's problem in the Senate is that there is already a long line for the Senate Majority leader slot (and that is assuming that the Democratic control of the senate persists). And as much as I would love to have Hillary as governor of my state, I think that would be a step down for her. In my opinion I think, despite Hillary's endorsement of Obama over the weekend, I think she is still hoping for a last-minute upset at the Convention in August. Sure, she's going to be a good girl and team player. But all it takes is one more major scandal or a major dip in the polls. Tony Rezko has yet to "sing," and many believe that he will start naming names in lieu of a long jail sentence. And then there is the Michelle "whitey" tape that is now rumored to be in Rudy Giuliani's possession and is expected to be released after the convention, that is, assuming that it can be kept under wraps for that long. But then again, there are rumors that party insiders don't really care whether or not Obama wins; they just like the fact that he can raise tons of money for the congressional races and enlist scores of new young and black voters.
I seriously doubt that tape exists. The money it is worth seemingly would ensure it would have been produced. Moreover, if Wright had possession of it, why would sabotage a black candidate's changes in favor of a rich white republican. Finally, if more than one copy exists, people would be selling them and/or getting money for talking about them. Clearly Soros would pay millions to shut them up.

As for Rezko, I doubt he is much of a threat as even if it is true, he is a collar looking for a deal.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #144  
Old 06-09-2008, 09:17 AM
HejiraNYC's Avatar
HejiraNYC HejiraNYC is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 4,834
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
I seriously doubt that tape exists. The money it is worth seemingly would ensure it would have been produced. Moreover, if Wright had possession of it, why would sabotage a black candidate's changes in favor of a rich white republican. Finally, if more than one copy exists, people would be selling them and/or getting money for talking about them. Clearly Soros would pay millions to shut them up.

As for Rezko, I doubt he is much of a threat as even if it is true, he is a collar looking for a deal.
Well, I'm not sure what to think about the tape. The source of the information, Larry Johnson, is an ex-CIA agent who has a legit track record of uncovering dirt on the Valerie Plame scandal, the Iraq War and I believe the Spitzer scandal as well. He is basing his assertion on two independent second-hand sources who have provided consistent descriptions about the shocking contents of the tape. There is also a theory that the local Chicago ABC News affiliate may have footage of this event in its archives, but apparently they are refusing to cooperate with any investigation without a subpoena. Sure, someone could probably come up with lots of hush money, but if it's true that Giuliani has the tape, then I am sure the GOP is keeping him honest one way or another. Plus Giuliani is not exactly hurting for money.

I think the Rezko conviction could be a sleeper surprise. He did receive lots of kickbacks and funding from the Illinois taxpayers, and some fingers are starting to point to Obama's influence in the state senate. And the whole situation regarding Rezko's role in the purchase of Obama's mansion has still not really been fully explained. The bottom line is that the man has been found guilty on 16 of 24 counts of corruption and faces a potential life term in prison. He has nothing to lose and everything to gain by singing. After all, hush money does you no good if you are behind bars.
Reply With Quote
  #145  
Old 06-09-2008, 11:11 AM
BombaySapphire3 BombaySapphire3 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 4,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
I would say that he squeaked out a win over the Clinton powerhouse, barely, despite the collusion of party insiders and the press, manipulation of caucuses and every low down and dirty campaign tactic. He's the Forrest Gump candidate as far as I am concerned. To be fair, he really should have completely decimated Hillary with all of the cards in his deck, but instead he lost the popular vote and had to get the party to select him despite the will of the people. Pathetic.
It seemed to me that Hillary entered the primary season as pretty much the guaranteed nominee of the party as it was pointed out to me on this forum by Hillary supporters last fall when I voiced my support for Obama with such statements as 'it ain't never gonna happen " in regard to Obama becoming the nominee.Obama's use of the internet for fund raising and being astute enough to understand the importance of caucus states contributed to him getting the nomination as well as I'll admit it the cult of personality .I also think it is tragically Medean for people that consider themselves Democrats to take their marbles amd go over to the other side considering what is at stake in Iraqi and the Supreme Court and the wingnut that an over 70 year old candidate is likely to choose as his V.P.
__________________
Children of the world the forgotten chimpanzee..in the eyes of the world you have done so much for me. ..SLN.

Reply With Quote
  #146  
Old 06-09-2008, 12:03 PM
BombaySapphire3 BombaySapphire3 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 4,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
He was already hand-selected by the DNC, so perhaps they're busy trying to figure out a way to get the Supreme Court to select the president again- in his favor, of course.
Well after all we do owe them one.
__________________
Children of the world the forgotten chimpanzee..in the eyes of the world you have done so much for me. ..SLN.

Reply With Quote
  #147  
Old 06-09-2008, 01:01 PM
gldstwmn's Avatar
gldstwmn gldstwmn is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Drowning in the sea of La Mer
Posts: 19,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
The pundits have been saying that the old Bill, i.e., pre-bypass surgery, would never have said these things. I don't know what to think... but apparently those kinds of major surgeries are pretty transforming.
Unfotunately that info comes from that sleazy Vanity Fair article. I still can't believe they printed that.
Reply With Quote
  #148  
Old 06-10-2008, 07:56 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Special-interest access abounds in campaign By SHARON THEIMER, Associated Press Writer
Tue Jun 10, 3:39 PM ET



Barack Obama and John McCain are billing themselves as distant from special interests. It doesn't take a very deep look into their White House bids to see that's false advertising.

Presidential races tap into the same political circles that keep lobbyists employed and the revolving door spinning. Obama and McCain have a long way to go to free themselves of insiders and special interests.

Roughly one-third of 93 "Reagan alumni" who endorsed McCain have been or are registered to lobby, though McCain never said so. The Florida fundraising team for McCain and the Republican National Committee, announced last week, includes at least two Florida lobbyists: Fred Karlinsky is Florida counsel to the Property Casualty Insurers Association, which lobbies in Washington on consumer issues, disaster planning and insurance; the other, Thomas Panza, served on Florida business regulation and health care study commissions.

Obama's team in Nevada, put together last summer to help him with the state's January caucuses, included at least two Nevada lobbyists: one that represented Barrick Gold of North America, a mining company that also lobbies in Washington, and another whose clients included U.S. Airways, Corrections Corp. of America and consulting company Accenture, which lobby in Washington.

McCain's advisory committee on legal issues, announced last month, included at least nine lobbyists, but McCain didn't identify them as such. Instead, his campaign listed them with their former government positions. In addition, the committee has members with lobbying ties, included at least five partners in Washington law and lobby firms who weren't personally registered to lobby and three former lobbyists.

Obama accepted an endorsement from former Sen. Don Riegle of Michigan but never mentioned Riegle also is a Washington lobbyist whose clients include London-based metals merchant Norimet Ltd. and Geneva-based liquor distributor SPI Group SA.

McCain and Obama have each taken new steps to hold lobbyists — at least those in Washington — at arm's length. But such moves are incomplete, at best, for putting real distance between their campaigns and special interests. Many operate below the public's radar: Unless the advisers are paid staff or donors, the candidates are not required to identify them or their lobbyist connections.

Obama and the DNC announced Thursday the party will follow Obama's policy of turning away donations from Washington lobbyists.

Last month, McCain adopted a conflict-of-interest policy that drove some Washington lobbyists from his campaign. They included former Texas Rep. Tom Loeffler, a McCain fundraiser and adviser. Those on the campaign payroll have had to sever their lobbying ties; McCain adviser Charlie Black recently retired from the prominent Washington lobbying firm he helped found. Volunteers must tell the campaign if they are lobbyists and cannot take part in campaign policymaking on subjects on which they lobby; if McCain wins, those who join his administration must promise never to lobby it. The policy doesn't mention people whose companies or groups hire lobbyists.

To consort only with outsiders, McCain and Obama would have to accept help only from people who never worked in politics, wanted anything from government or worked for anyone who has.

They would have to shun leaders of their own parties. The Democratic and Republican national committees include well-known Washington lobbyists among their top officials.

DNC vice chairwoman Lottie Shackelford, a former Little Rock, Ark., mayor, is a lobbyist whose clients include Hyundai Motor Co., which is pressing on free trade issues with Korea that Obama opposes. She also has worked for the Sallie Mae student loan provider, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and Allstate Insurance Co. Her firm boasts on its Web site of her "long-term relationship with American policymakers."

The lobbying clients of RNC vice chairman Frank Donatelli include the National Basketball Association, for whom he lobbied this year on steroids legislation, a tougher ban on Internet gambling, and immigration legislation that would guarantee work visas for minor-league players. Donatelli, executive vice president and federal public affairs director for McGuireWoods Consulting, worked for President Reagan and aided President Bush's 2000 Florida recount effort.

Other avenues for access abound. The well-connected take lead roles in organizing the upcoming nominating conventions. They raise money for the party and for candidates up and down the ticket, and for costly Inauguration Day galas in Washington. They take time off from their jobs to help get out the vote in battleground states. And they serve as advisers, paid or volunteer, to candidates who might invite them to advise the incoming administration.

McCain announced in January an ex-aide to presidential brother and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush agreed to help run "Lawyers for McCain" in Florida. Hayden Dempsey is a lobbyist with Greenberg Traurig, whose former star lobbyist, Jack Abramoff, was investigated by McCain when he was chairman of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee. Dempsey's state client list includes businesses that also lobby in Washington: the Amerigroup health-care company, MAXIMUS information technology firm and UnitedHealth Group insurance company.

Technology experts who endorsed Obama include Andrew McLaughlin, who lobbied Congress and the Bush administration on trade issues for Google Inc. last year with McCain donor and former McCain Senate chief counsel Pablo Chavez; and Ed Zander, chief executive of Motorola, an Illinois-based communications company that lobbies in Washington.

Lobbyists have made campaign appearances for McCain. They include former Oklahoma Gov. Frank Keating, chief executive of the American Council of Life Insurers and co-chairman of "Catholics for McCain." Another is former Navy Secretary William Ball, a Washington lobbyist whose client list includes Southwest Airlines, facing a record $10.2 million fine and congressional scrutiny over safety issues.

At least 17 lobbyists are among McCain's top fundraisers, including Jack Oliver III, a former national GOP official whose Washington lobbying list includes the Financial Services Forum, a group of banks and investment firms; and corporate giants Shell Oil Co., Verizon Communications Inc. and Union Pacific Corp. railroad.

Obama's biggest fundraisers include Charles Adams Jr., a partner in Hogan & Hartson, a law and lobbying firm active in Washington, and Michael Froman, who worked at the White House, Treasury Department and National Security Council and now works as an executive at Citigroup, which spent $8 million lobbying in Washington last year.

McCain's national campaign co-chairs include John Chambers, chief executive of Cisco Systems Inc., a technology company that spent $1.4 million last year lobbying in Washington on immigration, digital television, personal data privacy and security, patent legislation and trade issues. Another is former Homeland Security secretary and Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Ridge, who now runs a Washington consulting firm and sits on the boards of several high-tech companies, some of them federal contractors.

The Democratic presidential race could be considered a dream come true for some lobbyists.

Those lucky enough to rank as Democratic "superdelegates" free to back the candidate of their choice at the party's nominating convention found the tables turned: Two senators, Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton, needed their votes for a change, and for weeks courted superdelegates aggressively.

Superdelegates backing Obama include Joyce Brayboy of North Carolina, a Washington lobbyist and former congressional chief of staff whose clients include the American Bankers Association, Moneygram International money-transfer service and Recording Industry Association of America.

Obama superdelegate Moses Mercado of Texas, a former aide to then-Rep. Richard Gephardt, D-Mo., has been a lobbyist at the same Washington firm as Wayne Berman, who raised money for McCain. Mercado's client list at Ogilvy Government Relations includes the American Chemistry Council trade group; the American Petroleum Institute and Chevron, both with big stakes in energy policy; and the American Trucking Associations, whose priorities include highway funding and labor rules.

Shackelford, who lobbied Congress and the Bush administration on behalf of Hyundai, also lobbied for Lyondell Chemical Co. over discontinuing use of the gasoline additive MTBE, which helps prevent engines from knocking. MTBE's leading alternative is ethanol, which Obama supports. She is with the lobby firm Global USA, whose chairman, Stanton Anderson, lobbies for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce Institute for Legal Reform and is among Reagan alumni who endorsed McCain.

Another superdelegate, Robert Strauss of Texas, a former ambassador and Democratic National Committee chairman, founded the firm that became international law and lobbying giant Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld. Its clients include the governments of Panama and South Korea, who want trade agreements with the United States that Obama opposes. Akin Gump also lobbied for Chinese oil company CNOOC, reaching out to McCain's staff and others on Capitol Hill as CNOOC unsuccessfully tried to win backing for its offer to acquire Unocal.

Lobbying interests and candidates can help each other without breaking the law. Openly promising goodies such as federal contracts, policy decisions or political appointments in exchange for campaign money could amount to a felony, but there are plenty of benefits to be had without illegal quid pro quos.

Candidates receive money and support, and lobbyists gain political experience and the access they need. For state-level lobbyists, a week with the state's convention delegation can mean valuable time with the governor and legislative leaders. And ties to a presidential nominee and other powerful politicians can be their own reward as lobbyists, trade associations and unions work to keep and attract clients or members.

Hunter Johnston, a Washington lobbyist who raised money for Sen. John Kerry's 2004 Democratic presidential campaign, said it's risky for candidates to say lobbyists do not and cannot work in their campaigns or future administrations.

"You're excluding a large number of very competent people," Johnston said. "If they do make a statement, then it's hard to live up to such a statement, and if you live up to such a statement, I don't think it's in their interests."

____

Associated Press writers Ted Bridis and Jim Drinkard in Washington contributed to this report

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080610/...uxuc5IBBFh24cA
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #149  
Old 06-12-2008, 08:57 PM
LukeA LukeA is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
Well, I'm not sure what to think about the tape. The source of the information, Larry Johnson, is an ex-CIA agent who has a legit track record of uncovering dirt on the Valerie Plame scandal, the Iraq War and I believe the Spitzer scandal as well. He is basing his assertion on two independent second-hand sources who have provided consistent descriptions about the shocking contents of the tape. There is also a theory that the local Chicago ABC News affiliate may have footage of this event in its archives, but apparently they are refusing to cooperate with any investigation without a subpoena. Sure, someone could probably come up with lots of hush money, but if it's true that Giuliani has the tape, then I am sure the GOP is keeping him honest one way or another. Plus Giuliani is not exactly hurting for money.
As much as you want this to be true, it certainly looks like its not.

www.fightthesmears.com

So sorry to disappoint you.
Reply With Quote
  #150  
Old 06-12-2008, 09:12 PM
BombaySapphire3 BombaySapphire3 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: San Francisco Bay area
Posts: 4,503
Default

Even CNN is reporting today that it was totally fabricated by the blogger then picked up by ol' pigface Rush and others ...despicable really.
__________________
Children of the world the forgotten chimpanzee..in the eyes of the world you have done so much for me. ..SLN.

Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae picture

Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae

$56.99



Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae picture

Bob Brunning Sound Trackers Music Series Hardcover 6 Book Lot Pop, Metal, Reggae

$79.99



Bob Brunning Sound Trackers 1970s Pop Hardcover Book Import picture

Bob Brunning Sound Trackers 1970s Pop Hardcover Book Import

$19.99



Brunning, Bob : Sound Trackers: 1960s Pop Paperback Expertly Refurbished Product picture

Brunning, Bob : Sound Trackers: 1960s Pop Paperback Expertly Refurbished Product

$3.81



1960s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD picture

1960s Pop - Hardcover By Brunning, Bob - GOOD

$6.50




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved