The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Chit Chat
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 08-06-2004, 04:20 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Merf
WOOT!!!!

Did anyone see his speech today where he was talking about how it was important for soveriegn people to remain soveriegn and protect their sovereignty or something?? It was to a council of Minority members of the media, I think (the same one that Kerry spoke to the other day while he was in Davenport.)

Apparently the audience laughed at his non-sensical answers.
Read post #11.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-06-2004, 04:34 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Oh my. Pickles and Bunnypants are on Larry King next week.
__________________

Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-06-2004, 04:36 PM
gldstwmn's Avatar
gldstwmn gldstwmn is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Drowning in the sea of La Mer
Posts: 19,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissention
Oh my. Pickles and Bunnypants are on Larry King next week.
Major softballs will be lobbed. This should be fun.

<

Last edited by gldstwmn; 08-06-2004 at 04:44 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-07-2004, 12:45 AM
dontlookdown dontlookdown is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,148
Default

I can't decide if a Bush loss in November will make me feel the way I did when the Dance shows were announced....

I'm getting that giddy feeling all over.


What a f*cking loser this president is.

Are there really voters out there who think he's worthy of another term?

I can't think of a more pathetic leader in modern times. What a waste.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-07-2004, 07:42 AM
DeeGeMe's Avatar
DeeGeMe DeeGeMe is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,364
Default

I think that MoveOn.org or another organization needs to run that clip of Bush trying to answer the question as a commercial and ask if this is the man that America wants running the free world. It's the single most damning thing I've seen against Bush--it really shows you that he's a true dumb-ass who doesn't have a clue about what's going on in the world and can't articulate a word without a script--and even then, he's severely challenged. How would you like to be on his debate prep team? God, that must the single worst job in America!
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 08-07-2004, 09:09 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dontlookdown

Are there really voters out there who think he's worthy of another terrm?
Apparently half of he likely voters. THAT is far scarier to me.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-07-2004, 01:21 PM
gldstwmn's Avatar
gldstwmn gldstwmn is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Drowning in the sea of La Mer
Posts: 19,490
Default

I wonder how funny Al Gore's "Social Security in a lockbox" idea seems to most Americans now? I remember it was fodder for the comedians and late night shows for a while. I also remember W wanted to invest it in the stock market.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-07-2004, 01:51 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gldstwmn
I wonder how funny Al Gore's "Social Security in a lockbox" idea seems to most Americans now? I remember it was fodder for the comedians and late night shows for a while. I also remember W wanted to invest it in the stock market.
Well, he has not given that up. It is going to be part of the part II plan. Actually, I think he is going to steal Gore plan for being able to invest any amount over the required contributions to make a minimum monthly plan that everyone gets under the plan. In other words, all participants will get let's say $800 a month. If you have worked more and made more contributions so that you amount contributed and the amount you will receive will be in excess of the bottom and automatic $800, you can invest the diff - they are talking about having a few diff. fund options sort of like most provate employee plans. If it works - great - if not and you lose all of the extra in the market, you will still get the $800 a month. I think that is actually a great plan and would work. Also, the "extra" money earned does not leave the Trust Fund on the death of the recepiant. It goes back in the Fund. That is a win win to me.

I do not, however, think people should be able to invest blindly all of their SS money. That is just crazy.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-07-2004, 11:28 PM
MikeVielhaber MikeVielhaber is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dontlookdown
I can't decide if a Bush loss in November will make me feel the way I did when the Dance shows were announced....

I'm getting that giddy feeling all over.


What a f*cking loser this president is.

Are there really voters out there who think he's worthy of another term?

I can't think of a more pathetic leader in modern times. What a waste.
half the country actually......but you wouldnt think so by coming here where the liberals roam. and the majority of all the other forums are liberal and the majority of the media is liberal.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-07-2004, 11:31 PM
MikeVielhaber MikeVielhaber is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dontlookdown
I can't decide if a Bush loss in November will make me feel the way I did when the Dance shows were announced....

I'm getting that giddy feeling all over.


What a f*cking loser this president is.

Are there really voters out there who think he's worthy of another term?

I can't think of a more pathetic leader in modern times. What a waste.
what has kerry PROVEN to the american people that makes him more worthy.....besides not being george bush (that's probably good enough for some)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-08-2004, 12:59 AM
Johnny Stew's Avatar
Johnny Stew Johnny Stew is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 12,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeVielhaber
what has kerry PROVEN to the american people that makes him more worthy.....besides not being george bush (that's probably good enough for some)
Well, my friend, in what way has W. proven that HE'S worthy of the job?
Just because he happened to be in the White House on Sept. 11th, and implemented a "war on terror"?

Let's never forget that they STILL have not captured the mastermind behind those attacks, and that we've lost over 900 lives in a country where said mastermind does not reside.

Based on numerous facts, it is my assessment that George W. Bush has proven himself to be quite unworthy of the presidency, and does not deserve a second term.
__________________
"Although the arrogance of fame lingers like a thick cloud around the famous, the sun always seems to shine for Stevie." -- Richard Dashut, 2014
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-08-2004, 01:18 AM
gldstwmn's Avatar
gldstwmn gldstwmn is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Drowning in the sea of La Mer
Posts: 19,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeVielhaber
what has kerry PROVEN to the american people that makes him more worthy.....besides not being george bush (that's probably good enough for some)

http://www.johnkerry.com/about/john_kerry/bio.html
As he was graduating from Yale, John Kerry volunteered to serve in Vietnam, because, as he later said, "it was the right thing to do." He believed that “to whom much is given, much is required.” And he felt he had an obligation to give something back to his country. John Kerry served two tours of duty. On his second tour, he volunteered to serve on a Swift Boat in the river deltas, one of the most dangerous assignments of the war. His leadership, courage, and sacrifice earned him a Silver Star, a Bronze Star with Combat V, and three Purple Hearts.

But John Kerry's wartime experience taught him a painful lesson that he could not forget, even after he returned home. In the midst of battle, he had seen the lives of his fellow soldiers, his friends, put at risk because some leaders in Washington were making bad decisions. He decided he had a responsibility to his friends still serving, the friends he had lost, and his country, to help restore responsible leadership in America.

So he decided to become active as a Vietnam Veteran Against the War (VVAW). He became a spokesman for VVAW and later co-founded Vietnam Veterans of America. Only 27 years old, John Kerry sounded this call to reason in April 1971 when he testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and posed the powerful question, "How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

Later, John Kerry accepted another tour of duty - to serve in America's communities. After graduating from Boston College Law School in 1976, John Kerry went to work as a top prosecutor in Middlesex County, Massachusetts. He took on organized crime and put behind bars "one of the state's most notorious gangsters, the number two organized crime figure in New England." He fought for victims' rights and created programs for rape counseling.

John Kerry was elected Lieutenant Governor in 1982. In that office, he organized the nation's Governors to combat the acid rain that was polluting lakes, rivers, and the nation's water supply. Two years later, he was elected to the United States Senate and he has won reelection three-times since. He is now serving his fourth term, after winning again in 2002.

John Kerry entered the Senate with a reputation as a man of conviction. He confirmed that reputation by taking bold decisions on important issues. He helped provide health insurance for millions of low-income children. He has fought to improve public education, protect our natural environment, and strengthen our economy. He has been praised as one of the leading environmentalists in the Senate, who stopped the Bush-Cheney plan to drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

John Kerry has never forgotten the lessons he learned as a young man – lessons that have been strengthened in his 19 years on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He has learned that America must work with other countries to achieve our goals and the world's common goals. From his ground-breaking work on the Iran-Contra scandal to his leadership on global AIDS, John Kerry has distinguished himself as one of our nation's most respected voices on national security and international affairs.

As chairman of the Senate Select Committee on POW/MIA Affairs, he worked closely with John McCain to learn the truth about American soldiers missing in Vietnam and to normalize relations with that country. As the ranking Democrat on the East Asian and Pacific Affairs Subcommittee, he is a leading expert on that region, including North Korea.

Years before September 11th, John Kerry wrote The New War, an in-depth study of America's national security in the 21st Century. He worked on a bipartisan basis to craft the American response to September 11th and has been a leading voice on American policy in Iraq and Afghanistan, the war on terrorism, the Middle East peace process and Israel's security.

http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0227-07.htm
What's Right With Kerry
by David Corn

In the heat of battle, with his campaign crumbling, Howard Dean lashed out at John Kerry. First, he called the leader in the Democratic presidential race a "Republican." Then he said, "When Senator Kerry's record is examined by the public at a more leisurely time...he's going to turn out to be just like George Bush."

Just like George Bush? It is true that Kerry, another Yalie and Skull and Bones alum, has voted in favor of NAFTA and other corporate-friendly trade pacts, that he once raised questions about affirmative action (while still supporting it), that he has, like almost every Democratic senator, accepted contributions from special-interest lobbyists (while being one of the few to eschew political action committee donations), that he voted to grant Bush the authority to invade Iraq. But this hardly makes him Bush lite. There is, as evidence, his nineteen-year Senate record, during which he has voted consistently in favor of abortion rights and environmental policies, opposed Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy, led the effort against drilling in the Alaskan wilderness, pushed for higher fuel economy standards, advocated boosting the minimum wage and pressed for global warming remedies. But what distinguishes Kerry's career are key moments when he displayed guts and took tough actions that few colleagues would imitate. One rap on Kerry is that he is overly cautious and conventional. He's no firebrand on the stump, nor does he come across as the most passionate and exciting force for change. But his history in Washington includes episodes in which he demonstrated a willingness to confront hard issues, to challenge power, to pursue values rather than political advantage, to take risks for the public interest.

Kerry arrived in the Senate in 1985. This Vietnam War hero turned antiwar leader had been lieutenant governor of Massachusetts. But he entered the body more as the prosecutor he had been in the late 1970s after graduating from Boston College law school. In early 1986 Kerry's office was contacted by a Vietnam vet who alleged that the support network for the CIA-backed Nicaraguan contras (who were fighting against the socialist Sandinistas in power) was linked to drug traffickers. Kerry doubted that the Reagan Administration, obsessed with supporting the contras, would investigate such charges. He pushed for a Senate inquiry and a year later, as chairman of a Foreign Relations subcommittee, obtained approval to conduct a probe.

It was not an easy ride. Reagan Justice Department officials sought to discredit and stymie his investigation. Republicans dismissed it. One anti-Kerry effort used falsified affidavits to make it seem his staff had bribed witnesses. The Democratic staff of the Senate Iran/contra committee--which showed little interest in the contra drug connection--often refused to cooperate. "They were fighting us tooth and nail," recalls Jack Blum, one of Kerry's investigators. "We had the White House and the CIA against us on one side and our colleagues in the Senate on the other. But Kerry told us, 'Keep going.' He didn't let this stuff faze him."

Kerry's inquiry widened to look at Cuba, Haiti, the Bahamas, Honduras and Panama. In 1989 he released a report that slammed the Reagan Administration for neglecting or undermining anti-drug efforts in order to pursue other foreign policy objectives. It noted that the government in the 1970s and '80s had "turned a blind eye" to the corruption and drug dealing of Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega, who had done various favors for Washington (including assisting the contras). The report concluded that "individuals who provided support for the contras were involved in drug trafficking...and elements of the contras themselves knowingly received financial and material assistance from drug traffickers." And, it added, US government agencies--meaning the CIA and the State Department--had known this.

This was a rather explosive finding, but the Kerry report did not provoke much uproar in the media, and the Democratic leadership on Capitol Hill did little to support Kerry and keep the matter alive. His critics derided him as a conspiracy buff. Yet a decade later the CIA inspector general released a pair of reports that acknowledged that the agency had worked with suspected drug smugglers to support the contras. Kerry had been right.

After the contra investigation, Kerry next turned to a far more sensitive target: a bank connected to a prominent Democratic Party fundraiser. During their investigation of Noriega, Kerry's staff discovered that the Bank of Credit and Commerce International had facilitated Noriega's drug trafficking and money laundering. This led to an inquiry into BCCI, a worldwide but murky institution more or less controlled by the ruling family of Abu Dhabi. BCCI was a massive criminal enterprise, although this was not yet publicly known. It had engaged in rampant fraud and money laundering (to help out, among others, drug dealers, terrorists and arms traffickers) around the world. Its tentacles ran everywhere. Its political connections reached around the globe. Jimmy Carter and Henry Kissinger both became involved in the scandal. When banking regulators finally shut down BCCI in 1991, an estimated 250,000 creditors and depositors from forty countries were out billions of dollars.

One key issue was whether BCCI had secretly and illegally acquired control of First American bank in Washington, DC. The top officials of First American were Clark Clifford, a longtime Democratic graybeard and a party fundraiser, and Robert Altman, his protégé. Democratic senators grumbled about Kerry's crusade, which put Clifford in the cross-hairs. "This really pissed people off," Blum says. BCCI hired from both Democratic and Republican quarters an army of lawyers, PR specialists and lobbyists (including former members of Congress) to thwart the investigation. The Justice Department of the first Bush Administration did not respond to information on BCCI uncovered by Kerry's staff. So Blum took the material to New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, who then commenced an investigation of BCCI that led to indictments. And Kerry again found himself tussling with the CIA, for the agency had been using the services of BCCI even after it had learned that the bank was crooked and in league with terrorists (including Abu Nidal).

In the fall of 1992 Kerry released a report on the BCCI affair. It blasted everyone: Justice, Treasury, US Customs, the Federal Reserve, Clifford and Altman (for participating in "some of BCCI's deceptions"), high-level lobbyists and fixers, and the CIA. The report noted that after the CIA knew the bank was "a fundamentally corrupt criminal enterprise, it continued to use both BCCI and First American...for CIA operations." The report was, in a sense, an indictment of Washington cronyism. In the years since, there's been nothing like it. Senator Hank Brown, the ranking Republican on Kerry's subcommittee, noted, "John Kerry was willing to spearhead this difficult investigation. Because many important members of his own party were involved in this scandal, it was a distasteful subject for other committee and subcommittee chairmen to investigate. They did not. John Kerry did."

While Kerry was in the middle of the BCCI muck, Senate majority leader George Mitchell asked him to assume another difficult task: investigate the unaccounted-for Vietnam POWs and MIAs. For years so-called POW advocates, like billionaire Ross Perot, had claimed American GIs were still being held in Vietnam, and the highly charged POW/MIA issue was the main roadblock to normalizing relations. Working closely with Senator John McCain, a Republican who had been a POW, Kerry got the Pentagon to declassify 1 million pages of records. His committee chased after rumors of American soldiers being held. He took fourteen trips to Vietnam. This was a hard mission: How could his committee say there were absolutely no POWs still captive in Vietnam? Yet anything less could keep the POW controversy alive.

On one trip to Hanoi, as Douglas Brinkley notes in Tour of Duty: John Kerry and the Vietnam War, Kerry insisted that he be allowed to inspect the catacombs beneath Ho Chi Minh's tomb, where, according to a persistent rumor, the remaining POWs were being held. Permission was granted, and with conservative Republican Bob Smith by his side, he inspected the tunnels and found no signs of POWs. In January 1993 Kerry's POW/MIA committee released a 1,223-page report concluding that there was "no compelling evidence that proves any American remains alive in captivity in Southeast Asia." Some POW die-hards howled. (Journalist Sydney Schanberg has accused Kerry of covering up and destroying evidence that POWs were left behind.) But the report mostly settled the issue. President Bill Clinton was able to drop the Vietnam trade embargo and normalize relations.

Investigations were not the only notable moments in Kerry's Senate career. On September 10, 1996, as he was in a tight re-election contest against William Weld, the popular Republican governor of Massachusetts, Kerry voted against the Defense of Marriage Act, which would deny federal benefits to same-sex couples and permit states to not recognize same-sex marriages conducted in other states. He was one of only fourteen senators to oppose the measure. Several leading Senate liberals--including Paul Wellstone, Tom Harkin and Pat Leahy--had voted for it. But on the floor of the Senate that day, Kerry, who noted that he did not support same-sex marriage, said, "I am going to vote against this bill...because I believe that this debate is fundamentally ugly, and it is fundamentally political." He refused to pretend that the bill was not a wedge-issue trap devised by conservative Republicans. The legislation, he charged, was "meant to divide Americans," and he argued fiercely that it was unconstitutional. "If this were truly a defense of marriage act," he said, "it would expand the learning experience for would-be husbands and wives. It would provide for counseling for all troubled marriages, not just for those who can afford it. It would provide treatment on demand for those with alcohol and substance abuse.... It would guarantee daycare for every family that struggles and needs it."

The following year, a re-elected Kerry was in another lonely position as one of only five original sponsors of the Clean Money, Clean Elections Act, to provide for full public financing of Congressional elections. The measure would remove practically all special-interest money from House and Senate campaigns. (Kerry's colleagues were Wellstone, Leahy, John Glenn and Joe Biden--all Democrats.) "Kerry was totally into it," says Ellen Miller, former executive director of Public Campaign, a reform group pressing for the legislation. "He believes in this stuff."

In introducing the legislation, Kerry said on the Senate floor, "Special interest money is moving and dictating and governing the agenda of American politics.... If we want to regain the respect and confidence of the American people, and if we want to reconnect to them and reconnect them to our democracy, we have to get the special interest money out of politics." He was also a backer of the better-known McCain-Feingold legislation, a more modest and (some might say) problematic approach to campaign reform. But over the years he's pointed to the Clean Money, Clean Elections Act as the real reform. "It is a tough position in Congress to be for dramatic change in financing elections," says Miller. "It's gutsy to go out and say, 'Let's provide a financially leveled playing field so there is more competition for incumbents.' Kerry and Wellstone were the leaders and took a giant step. It was remarkable."

After two decades in the Senate, Kerry has a long record that can be picked apart by competitors within his own party as well as in the GOP. And though he has been re-elected three times, he has not developed the best political skills. He has not shed a manner too easily criticized as aloof or patrician. He has had brushes with smarmy campaign financing. But there have been times he has shown courage, devotion to justice and commitment to honesty, open government and principle-over-politics. There are few senators of whom that can be said. A full assessment of the man ought to take these portions of his public service into account.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-08-2004, 01:21 AM
gldstwmn's Avatar
gldstwmn gldstwmn is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Drowning in the sea of La Mer
Posts: 19,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Stew
Well, my friend, in what way has W. proven that HE'S worthy of the job?
Just because he happened to be in the White House on Sept. 11th, and implemented a "war on terror"?

Let's never forget that they STILL have not captured the mastermind behind those attacks, and that we've lost over 900 lives in a country where said mastermind does not reside.

Based on numerous facts, it is my assessment that George W. Bush has proven himself to be quite unworthy of the presidency, and does not deserve a second term.
Not to mention Bush was not duly elected. He was appointed by the supreme court. I've got a long list of Gerogie's "accomplishments" if anyone wants to go there.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-08-2004, 01:23 AM
gldstwmn's Avatar
gldstwmn gldstwmn is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Drowning in the sea of La Mer
Posts: 19,490
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeVielhaber
half the country actually...
Half of the country? We haven't even voted yet and need I remind you that George didn't get 50% of the vote last time.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-08-2004, 01:34 AM
MikeVielhaber MikeVielhaber is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 954
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gldstwmn
Not to mention Bush was not duly elected. He was appointed by the supreme court. I've got a long list of Gerogie's "accomplishments" if anyone wants to go there.
would you use that against gore had he won? because no matter what it was going to the supreme court. at no point did gore have a lead in FL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Rick Vito CDs Lot of 3 Crazy Cool, Rattlesnake Shake, Pink & Black Signed picture

Rick Vito CDs Lot of 3 Crazy Cool, Rattlesnake Shake, Pink & Black Signed

$74.99



RICK VITO of FLEETWOOD MAC New Sealed Ltd Ed 2024 CADILLAC MAN Solo CD picture

RICK VITO of FLEETWOOD MAC New Sealed Ltd Ed 2024 CADILLAC MAN Solo CD

$22.99



Rick Vito Desiree CD picture

Rick Vito Desiree CD

$9.99



Rick Vito - Lucky In Love: The Best Of Rick Vito - Rick Vito CD 6IVG The Cheap picture

Rick Vito - Lucky In Love: The Best Of Rick Vito - Rick Vito CD 6IVG The Cheap

$12.22



King of Hearts by Rick Vito (CD, Feb-1992, Modern) picture

King of Hearts by Rick Vito (CD, Feb-1992, Modern)

$10.50




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved