|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fleetwood Mac Just Got More Interesting
|
. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
cool take
Nice opinion piece on the new lineup. Interesting.
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
You could remove Stevie Nicks and add Pat Benatar and Fleetwood Mac would be more interesting. The premise of the article is correct. The removal of Buckingham and addition of 2 new people does make it interesting. It just does not make it Fleetwood Mac IMHO. When Fleetwood Mac continued without Christine, it was interesting for a brief moment but the band lost its soul. IMHO it was not Fleetwood Mac.
The article drools over Finn as the most creative artist in the world. Well he is not being hired to be creative. The Mac is not recording an album. He is hired to fit the suit and play guitar and sing on a concert tour. If the Mac had 10 more years and 2 more studio albums to make, then it could be interesting. But sadly everyone knows this is the last tour and last breath of Fleetwood Mac. Now to the wrong parts of the article. The author mocks Lindsey's singing that he no longer can sing. WTF? Lindsey has kept his singing voice which is something you cant say of Stevie and Christine. The author is really grasping at straws for that one. The author is excited that Crowded House songs and Heartbreaker songs will be played. The funny part was the author stating Finn could sing them better than Petty. WTF? If you want to hear Crowded House music, would you not rather attend a Crowded House concert? So Mac fans now must embrace Crowded House music because Finn plays guitar in Fleetwood Mac? Now if you really wanted to make Fleetwood Mac more interesting, why not replace Mick with Don Henley. Then Stevie can sing leather and lace with him. A few Eagles songs could be played too. Stevie can hire Brad Jeffries to dance during Stand Back. They also could do a giant balloon drop during Don't Stop. All these things would make Fleetwood Mac more interesting. Replacing Keith Richards with Angus Young would make the Rolling Stones so much more interesting. Some of us don't want Fleetwood Mac more interesting. Many of you can guzzle down the New Coke but many of us are sticking to the Classic.
__________________
My heart will rise up with the morning sun and the hurt I feel will simply melt away Last edited by Macfan4life; 04-25-2018 at 04:17 AM.. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Of course this doesn't mean that he can't sing, you can produce very amazing sounds even without knowing how to sing technically, I'm thinking for example about Lana del Rey (at least when she first started), but of course to great detriment. |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Pat Benatar replacing Stevie Nicks? That WOULD be interesting and I would totally be intrigued! Or Ann Wilson, for that matter! Her voice seems to have held up very well.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Pat Benatar. Ew. No. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Either Bonnie Raitt, whose blues playing and gravely but dynamic voice would have been a great fit for the band, or Susanna Hoffs, who I think sounds like a younger Stevie and would probably have a really good chemistry with Lindsey, would have been my choices.
__________________
On and on it will always be, the rhythm, rhyme, and harmony. THE Stephen Hopkins |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
More interesting to me would've been the Rumours Five going on, making new music and touring on that, and the history that IS FM! Way back to Peter Green and forward. If that wasn't feasible, I'd say kick out the non creative being, namely one that can only bleat and moan, add no one, and continue as the Rumours Four!!
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
__________________
On and on it will always be, the rhythm, rhyme, and harmony. THE Stephen Hopkins |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
STEVIE NICKS! WHERE ARE YOU?!!
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I'm feeling quite bad for Neil Finn. Well I'm an Aussie and I've long been a fan, since 80s. (We tend to claim the New Zealand talent as our own - they've produced some amazing musical artists.) He's a very good musician, writer, and seems a nice guy as well.
Hope it works out for him with FM, though at first it seems an odd kind of choice. Stranger things have happened and worked out okay. How he may fit in this band - like Stevie and Lindsey, I think that the Everly Brothers and The Beatles were enormous influences on him and his brother. I think he's a natural harmoniser and that may have been a factor for including him. That's not all there is to him though. We might think of him as a folkie type, but it's occurred to me in last few weeks, Split Enz had a punk edge in quite a few of their songs. Studio processing might have removed some of it but in the stripped back live versions it's more obvious. Even though I think he's a calmer guy than Lindsey - he has known his share of band drama in the past and can probably tap into how that's shown itself in FM's music. And yeh I'd love to hear FM do 'I Got You' with Christine doing the synth part - would be perfect! (Pun not intended.) 'I Hope I Never' is also a great keyboard piece. No, it won't be 'Fleetwood Mac' as most of us know them. But it may be something new and different for them after getting in a sort of rut with their show. I decided I was gonna be happy with seeing them in 2015 and it would be the last time I see them. Figured if I went again in another few years it would probably be much the same thing as last time but maybe not such a strong performance. Hoping folks give the new guys a chance. Last edited by Missy; 04-30-2018 at 10:35 AM.. |
|
|
Billy Burnette - Try Me 1985 USA Orig. Vinyl LP E/E
$3.99
Billy Burnette – Shoo-Be-Doo Polydor – PD 14530, Promo, 7"
$5.00
[ROCK/POP]~EXC LP~BILLY BURNETTE~Self Titled~[Original 1980~CBS~Issue] nm
$7.77
Signed Tangled Up In Texas by Billy Burnette (CD, Capricorn/Warner Bros.,1992)
$35.00
Billy Burnette - Billy Burnette [New CD] Rmst, Reissue
$15.38