Maybe he told her she couldn't make any snarky comments on social media.
Maybe he wanted her to have dinner with him with Mick as part of the 'reconnecting' and she couldn't bring herself to swallow that much sh&t.
Maybe she felt like him choosing the band again after she so publicly smacked them down for how they treated him was disrespectful to her.

I was skimming through BuckVie the other night...it all puts his music on there in a new light potentially.... things get tough but Love Is Here to Stay.... and some of his last solo albums... I always found That's the Way That Love Goes very curious and now....:shrug:

Lindsey said she has a “purchasing disorder”
In an interview lol

I believe it! Picture frames, coffee tables, horses, houses, stables, Italian marble kitchen slabs....

On an SN fan twitter acount, they posted a TMZ stamped paper that says grounds is adultery.

Link?? :eek:

Can't do the work for you:D

that's fine. I don't follow any Stevie fan accounts on twitter, so in the absence of any links or proof, I'll just go with my instinct that whatever gets tweeted there is malarkey.

I mean, even if the grounds for divorce are ever made public, we’ll never fully know or understand why they’re divorcing. Personally, I blame Carol Ann Harris, the grannie panties incident, Kenny Rogers, and the entire nation of New Zealand.

Since you don’t need to state a grounds for divorce in California, it would shock me if adultery was listed.

I doubt a parent would make that claim, if even for the kids sake.

And if she did, TMZ would likely say so. That is what they live for. It’s not as if Harvey Levin suddenly got religion.

Here's the post on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/stillofmynight/s...797504/photo/1

Somebdy made a fake document. That is not the format of a CA family court filing. The false flag maker / fake creator got their wish. Create a fallacy and then get the gullible and / or news desperate to fill a narrative, to reproduce and spread in other forums.

I have no idea why Lindsey and Kristen are divorcing. I do know divorce is genteelly awful for all impacted, from the spouses. to the three children, including a minor, and the extended family and friends.

I have avoided commenting on this thread, as it's is not my place to speculate about the reasons for marital dissolution, but this spreading of an obviously false document compelled me to write.

What has been posted is the type of information you would find on the court's website. That is the correct format for that, for the most part. It's not the petition for dissolution. It's just the court case information that you will find on the courthouse website if you put in the CORRECT case number and courthouse. However, the court's website would not list the grounds for divorce.

That case number listed on twitter is not for the Buckingham dissolution either. That case number is for a couple with the surname RIOS.

You can go to the court website and put in case number and courthouse information and find the same:

http://www.lacourt.org/casesummary/u...type=familylaw

Plus, do they still have any minor children? I think not.