Mike Campbell talks about FM in New interview

[mitzo]

Originally Posted by UnwindedDreams

Yea. "The mitzo" who says Lindsey has no fans. Yet there were people from South America and Asia on the stream last night.

$15, LOL.

[UnwindedDreams]

Originally Posted by mitzo

$15, LOL.

Wow, that's foul. Do you even realize that $15 is a hardship for people now?

[HomerMcvie]

Originally Posted by UnwindedDreams

Wow, that's foul. Do you even realize that $15 is a hardship for people now?

He/ she doesn't care.

BTW, you know that $tevie is THE MOST POPULAR MEMBER.... YOU KNOW THAT, RIGHT? I'm sure her tickets would have been at least $100. Probably double or triple that!

$tevie is the MOST POPULAR!!!!! DO YOU HEAR ME?

[UnwindedDreams]

Originally Posted by HomerMcvie

He/ she doesn't care.

BTW, you know that $tevie is THE MOST POPULAR MEMBER.... YOU KNOW THAT, RIGHT? I'm sure her tickets would have been at least $100. Probably double or triple that!

$tevie is the MOST POPULAR!!!!! DO YOU HEAR ME?

And the iconic Chris Isaak, Vanessa Carlton, and Leann Rimes could have charged $40 more than Lindsey and their streams would have crashed way sooner!!!

So Lindsey, step it up

[SteveMacD]

Originally Posted by HomerMcvie

BTW, you know that $tevie is THE MOST POPULAR MEMBER.... YOU KNOW THAT, RIGHT? I'm sure her tickets would have been at least $100. Probably double or triple that!

LOL, GbV charged $25, which also went to charity when they did a streaming show earlier this year. Of course, they had the foresight to film the show first and then stream it through a service.

$tevie is the MOST POPULAR!!!!! DO YOU HEAR ME?

Well, I mean, in the past month, one of them released a live set with deep cuts that was filmed in arenas, shown in theaters, and is being shown on PBS while the other Zoomed a short, predictable set with karaoke backing tracks from his living room and experienced technical difficulties. But that’s the price for art, right?

[elle]

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

LOL, GbV charged $25, which also went to charity when they did a streaming show earlier this year. Of course, they had the foresight to film the show first and then stream it through a service.


Well, I mean, in the past month, one of them released a live set with deep cuts that was filmed in arenas, shown in theaters, and is being shown on PBS while the other Zoomed a short, predictable set with karaoke backing tracks from his living room and experienced technical difficulties. But that’s the price for art, right?

Right. Why bother doing show actually live when you can prerecord it right? Well if that’s your preference you can watch yesterday’s live show prerecorded today. Sounds like you are confused about whether you want karaoke or not 😂. Clearly you always want opposite from what Lindsey is doing! 😆

So you are saying instead of recording and touring new album LB should have recorded a BuckVie tour and Anthology tour, both with tons of rarities and new songs, screen them in theaters and put them on tv, then process to sell online? While I wouldn’t mind having those live shows, he already did that in the past. It’s regurgitation or stuff already done few years ago.

[SteveMacD]

Originally Posted by elle

Right. Why bother doing show actually live when you can prerecord it right? Well if that’s your preference you can watch yesterday’s live show prerecorded today.

If you can explain the practical difference, I’d love to know. Either way, it’s a 100% live show that people pay to stream and is shown at a specific time. Would it have been different in any meaningful way to most people? Would it have changed anyone’s perception of Lindsey as an artist? It certainly would have been better than watching Lindsey brooding or fans being upset because of technical difficulties.

Sounds like you are confused about whether you want karaoke or not.

Do you even know what karaoke is?

Clearly you always want opposite from what Lindsey is doing!

No, I want him to actually be what he purports to be, you know, like Richard Thompson. Lindsey talks about pushing artistic boundaries and then does a setlist like that. I mean, what better opportunity to debut a new song off his forthcoming album? He has six solo albums, seven Fleetwood Mac albums, and songs from soundtracks, surely there’s a deeper cut than “Stephanie”. (BTW, while I realize he did that on OMS, it’s still weird that Stevie recently released a live version of “Crying In The Night” and he opted to do “Stephanie.”)

[elle]

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

If you can explain the practical difference, I’d love to know. Either way, it’s a 100% live show that people pay to stream and is shown at a specific time. Would it have been different in any meaningful way to most people? Would it have changed anyone’s perception of Lindsey as an artist?

do you even know what "live" means?

show is either live or pre-recorded. (and you could get both with Lindsey yesterday.) when it's live it is raw and you get glitches and warts. you get the reaction in the moment. you know, stuff that people usually complain about with LB - that he's a perfectionist and control freak. apparently not anymore - not nearly as much as some others.

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

I mean, what better opportunity to debut a new song off his forthcoming album? He has six solo albums, seven Fleetwood Mac albums, and songs from soundtracks, surely there’s a deeper cut than “Stephanie”.

haha changing topics i see. you know that i've been complaining about this on social media all day. but that' a different topic that belongs in LB forum where we're been discussing it.

[UnwindedDreams]

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

Do you even know what karaoke is?


(BTW, while I realize he did that on OMS, it’s still weird that Stevie recently released a live version of “Crying In The Night” and he opted to do “Stephanie.”)

The use of "even" highlights the animus!

Weird would be appopriate to use, if it's also weird that Stevie talks about Lindsey in majority of recent interviews.

[michelej1]

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

If you can explain the practical difference, I’d love to know. Either way, it’s a 100% live show that people pay to stream and is shown at a specific time. Would it have been different in any meaningful way to most people? Would it have changed anyone’s perception of Lindsey as an artist? It certainly would have been better than watching Lindsey brooding or fans being upset because of technical difficulties.

Lindsey wasn’t brooding, unless you count 3 seconds of time mentioning the glitch as brooding.

If you do, If you consider that brooding, I would be very interested as to how you would describe Heathcliff.

[FuzzyPlum]

Originally Posted by SteveMacD

No, I want him to actually be what he purports to be, you know, like Richard Thompson. Lindsey talks about pushing artistic boundaries and then does a setlist like that. I mean, what better opportunity to debut a new song off his forthcoming album? He has six solo albums, seven Fleetwood Mac albums, and songs from soundtracks, surely there’s a deeper cut than “Stephanie”. (BTW, while I realize he did that on OMS, it’s still weird that Stevie recently released a live version of “Crying In The Night” and he opted to do “Stephanie.”)

Dude, your adoration for Richard Thompson is getting a bit boring now...and kind of odd too. You sure you're on the right board?

...Richard Thompson blah blah blah...

[FuzzyPlum]

Originally Posted by mitzo

$15, LOL.

????
Wow, are you taking the p!ss at the fact he's charged $15?
The guy has done a live show for his fans and charged a tokenistic $15 sum.
I hardly think he's doing this show to make money.
Rather than laugh out loud, it should be well done, good on him!