Strike threat leaves Harley plant in dust

[gldstwmn]

http://money.cnn.com/2007/02/01/news...ex.htm?cnn=yes

Production is halted as workers at York, Pa. plant overwhelmingly reject proposed contract offering lower wages and benefits for new workers.
February 1 2007: 1:39 PM EST


CHICAGO (Reuters) -- Harley-Davidson Motor Co. said Thursday that it halted production at its largest assembly plant after workers there rejected a proposed three-year contract and authorized a strike that could begin early Friday.

The workers at the motorcycle maker's York, Pennsylvania, plant voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to reject a proposed new contract that called for lower wages and benefits for new workers and forced all union-represented workers to pay more for health insurance.


The 2,798 York workers, who are represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 175, also voted to authorize a strike beginning a minute after midnight, when the current contract expires.

In a statement released Thursday that acknowledged the vote, Harley said it was disappointed by the potential disruption, which one analyst said could cost the company $11 million in lost sales and shave a penny off earnings per share for each day it lasts.

In 2006, Harley earned $3.93 a share on sales of $5.80 billion.

Collectible cars of tomorrow
Harley said the contract concessions were necessary to help the company, which is currently enjoying growing sales and profit, avoid finding itself "in the same position that the Detroit auto industry is in now" 10 years down the road.

Harley said it was immediately suspending production of the Touring and Softail motorcycles the York plant produces.

No strike since '91
The stakes in a prolonged walkout are potentially high. In a note to investors, Tim Conder, an analyst at A.G. Edwards & Sons, pointed out that the two bikes that come out of York are Harley's highest-margin products and account for about 60 percent of all the units it makes.

Michael Savner, an analyst at Bank of America Equity Research, estimated a strike would cost the company roughly $11 million in sales, and about a penny per share of profit for every day the production shutdown lasts.

But Conder said he was optimistic that the issues would be "quickly resolved," and a strike averted, citing Harley's "long history of extremely good company/labor relations."

Harley, which faces similar contract expirations in Kansas City later this summer and in Milwaukee early next year, hasn't experienced a work disruption since 1991.

At that time the York workers, who make between 700 and 800 bikes a day, staged a walkout that was quickly resolved.

Porsche CEO moves closer to VW
Craig R. Kennison, an analyst at R.W. Baird, said he thought any strike this time would be similarly "short-lived." Harley had planned for a short strike when it issued its first-quarter shipment guidance last month and that shipments of the two bikes the plant makes during the fourth quarter left dealers with "ample supply to satisfy demand during the off-season," he said.

"While a prolonged strike could do some harm to the brand," Kennison wrote in a note to investors, "a short disruption would do little damage."

Shares of Harley (up $0.71 to $68.98,) rose 1 percent in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

Harley's stock has lagged competitors in the last three months. It has risen 0.9 percent, compared to gains around 11 percent for Ducati, Honda and Polaris.

[skcin]

The workers at the motorcycle maker's York, Pennsylvania, plant voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to reject a proposed new contract that called for lower wages and benefits for new workers and forced all union-represented workers to pay more for health insurance.

1 - why shouldn't newbies have a lower starting wage & less benefits? I thought you had to earn these things after years of service & seniority, not walk right into it.

2 - why shouldn't they pay part of their health insurance? It's insane to think that people should have 100% paid family coverage paid for by their employer in this day & age. Sorry. Not gonna happen for much longer. Things have changed from 10 or 20 years ago, and that's just the way it is. Health costs aren't going to get any cheaper.

I'm really ambivalent about union issues. I know they're there to protect workers. But IMO they're much of the reason that so many companies are a mess right now - laying off, shutting down completely. For years the unions fought & fought for a good wage & benefit package. They got it. Now, years later when places are drowning because they can't keep up with costs, they won't budge.

They just had a problem at the Delphi plant here. Went bankrupt. Workers had to either take early retirement (lump sum paid to leave) or stay on at a lower wage. Those were the only two options. Many left, and guess what? They had been making upwards of $35 an hour. So there were more than enough new workers who were more than happy to take have the same job at $14 an hour.

[estranged4life]

Nowadays benefit packages usually come back to hurt the employee in some way. The benefit packages at my one former employer in Chickasha were costing the company so much extra that to compensate the company had to raise production costs to offset that extra cost.

Of course the purchasers of the product told ________ they were taking their business to another manufacturer which they did. Now ________ has only 1 shift instead of the 3 shifts when I was their employee.

The great benefit package that ________ had (Which they boldly promoted in the newspaper during hiring sessions as a lure) is now a distant memory. ________ has hired 'temporary service' workers to fill the need of those who left the company due to the downgraded benefits packages.

I agree with Paula about the 100% family health coverage. Deb pays bi-weekly out of her check for her insurance coverage and never complains, whereas some of her co-workers whine about that measly extra $20 every 2 weeks. ****, wished I could pay $20 for comprehensive health coverage.